Home Knowledge Articles The next big thing- Value Selling
MFAA Logo

Shopping Cart

Your cart is empty

Resources

We are always on the look out for more products or services to make our site more comprehensive. If you are a service provider and have a resource or a service that you would like to offer members of the Australian mortgage industry through this site, please do not hesitate to contact us
The next big thing- Value Selling

David Hayward | Money Institute | April 28, 2011

Quite often we hear about the challenges to selling, overcoming obstacles in the sales process, closing the sale, clinching the deal and just how competitive the mortgage market really is. At face value this appears true because of the thousands & thousands of mortgage brokers, groups, banks and bank lenders all competing for the same customer.

The stark reality is, there is not a great deal of genuine differentiation in either product offers or service offers from the majority of those involved in the mortgage industry. This is not just speculation but based on direct observations of over 1500 mortgage professionals over the last 5 years. When pressed for distinct competitive differentiation over 90% would say..’great customer service’.

The problem with this, besides it not being accurate, is it is too general and not specific enough. What part of the customer service spectrum are you better at than your peers and competitors? How do you know? How have you tested this? Just completing the functionality of your job efficiently is not a basis of such a critical point of differentiation.

So if it is not customer service, what is your distinct competitive advantage?

Which leads to the heading of this article. The next big thing will be value selling. This is the crux of all successful sales processes and sales people. It is the point where the customer is prepared to exchange their value (usually in the form of some type of payment) for the value of the service you offer and provide to them.

In other words ‘Fee for Service’. Which creates somewhat of a problem for the broker as the customer doesn’t pay you for the value you offer but the bank does. In essence this waters down the real value you bring to the transactional process of acquiring the right home loan for the customer, which will meet their needs now but also consider the future needs as well.

There is no doubt that despite plenty of opposition, Fee for Service will become the norm in the Australian Broker market within the next 5 years. It is already the case in the UK. The industry, closely aligned to brokering, the Financial Planning sector has already moved down that path.

And it makes sense for many reasons. Firstly to offset reducing bank commissions & trails. Secondly to increase revenue per customer interaction, so you can get paid for the service & not just the product. Thirdly because it is really the only way to differentiate yourself from the thousands of others like you.

Customers will pay for a professional service IF they perceive value in that service offering. The value can be attained by utilising the knowledge, experience, insights & skills you have acquired by becoming truly an expert in your field and applying this to the customer’s full advantage, over time so they can see this value. To help you do just that, it may be worth you looking at the new Mortgage Analyst accreditation program developed by us to help you ‘Value Sell’.

Futher informaiton on "Becoming a Mortgage Analyst" can be found at:
http://www.moneyinstitute.com.au/mortgage-analyst/index.php

 

Comments  

 
+1 # Mikey 2011-04-28 14:05
Other professions are able to justify a fee for service. If there is a serious take up of this it could mean that the reliance on receiving commissions from the banks may be reduced and in turn put pressure on them to keep/maintain their business channels
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Jon A 2011-04-28 14:11
It is about time that the public get educated to pay brokers for our years of experience.... The lenders pay their pittance for the loan processing - Not for structuring, understanding adn looking after the borrowers complete financial requirements.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
0 # Rob 2011-04-28 15:45
I've discussed the topic of fee for service with many of my "sophisticated" clients who I trust to have this type of conversation with (NOTE - 95% of my clients are multiple property investors)..all have said they would NOT pay for my advice and service ..they all said they would deal direct with the banks because it's cheaper. Lets wait and see.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Alex 2011-04-28 16:29
Hi Rob ,i am a fee for service financial advisor and have significantly increased my fees since going fee for service. Providing you truly provide value and you can evidence this to clients they will not have an issue in paying for advice. The difficulty is that the commission we are paid is more of a implementation fee rather than a commission for advice.I already charge my clients a fee for structure etc before moving to product.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
0 # Bill 2011-04-28 16:15
Every professional broker I speak to wants to leave the system the way it is. Clients will not pay when they can go direct to the bank for free, end of story. The banks would look for any excuse to stop our commissions. It's about time the MFAA took a realistic poll of its members and realised it aint broke and to stop trying to fix it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Jon A 2011-04-28 17:03
Hi Bill

Don't you think your experience and knowledge is worth anything? Have you met a branch lender recently? Do you use a tax agent or an accountant?

Banks pay brokers for the loan application, not for structuring and ensuring the client gets the right product and more importantly structure. Don't you think that if brokers had alternative professional fees, then we would gain control of the market and lenders would be forced toincrease commissions to get our business?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
0 # David Hayward 2011-04-28 18:46
[quote name="Jon A"]

I think this precisely demonstrates my point. The broker doesn't feel he offers any value over a bank lender. That being the case, the customer will perceive the same thing and brokers will never be able to charge a fee comensurate with their expertise. Look at the headlines today regarding financial planners and make up your own mind about where this is heading.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
0 # Allen 2011-04-29 06:03
Here at Mortgage Mart we have had a fee for service loan available to brokers for over 12 months now. A very popular product and cheaper rates than the Banks
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Lee 2011-05-03 17:44
I was a broker in the eighties when banks did not pay for mortgages and we charged the customer. I was probably one of 60 or 70 brokers operating in Sydney. The growth began when banks started paying brokers commisions (around 1997). The growth made people comfortable with using a perceptually free service and saw the industry mushroom. I cant see a customer getting to excited about paying a fee for a loan with the CBA when they could have got it for free and potenially quicker going themselves.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

All comments will automatically be screened before posted.


Security code
Refresh

More Info
We have 2 guests online